Monday - November 04, 2013

doing away with gender bias toys and ban the words him and her. it confuses kids.

I read something upsetting in the paper perhaps it was yesterday.
Something I just could not get my head around because it seems, to me anyway, so damn nonsensical.  And the thing of it is, all this pc crap we’ve been slaves to is promoted by small groups but very vocal and troublesome ones.

Going back many years ago, (the 60s?) it was decided that the term Miss was anti woman and derogatory and demeaning, so on and so forth. Decided by who exactly?  A handful of femanazis who changed Miss to Mz, originally and finally to Ms. and pronounced as mizz. And everyone simply caved in and bought into it because I suppose it wasn’t something large enuff to make a stink about and far easier to give in and move on.

Well, little by little by little, a little later on, other things began to change too.  Here in Britain coloured to describe someone who was, well … coloured, became an offensive word.  Another group decided that gay was a nice word to describe their own particular lifestyle and so now, how many of you will describe a nice day in the country or at a beach as, having a gay time?  And always the changes are not made by a majority of the population.  So here we are today with something else a minority group is changing.  I thought is was recent as in this year.  Guess I’ve been asleep because in November of 2012 in Sweden …..

Have a gender neutral holiday! Swedish toy company bans photos of girls holding dolls from its catalogue pages

“For several years, we have found that the gender debate has grown so strong in the Swedish market that we ... have had to adjust,” Jan Nyberg, director of sales at Top Toy, franchise-holder toy chain Toys R Us, told the TT news agency Friday

Sweden’s largest toy chain said Friday that its toys are “gender neutral” after picturing boys holding baby dolls and banishing girls from the dolls pages of its Christmas catalogue.

“For several years, we have found that the gender debate has grown so strong in the Swedish market that we ... have had to adjust,” Jan Nyberg, director of sales at Top Toy, franchise-holder for US toy chain Toys R Us, told the TT news agency Friday.

The country’s advertising watchdog reprimanded the company for gender discrimination three years ago following complaints over outdated gender roles in the 2008 Christmas catalogue, which featured boys dressed as superheroes and girls playing princess.

sweden 2012

There’s more but I know you get the picture.

So I happen to be reading the paper over breakfast when I ran across this.

And I wish the heck they would stop using the word “pressurised” as you see here, when the term pressured in this case sounds better and besides, isn’t pressurised somewhat different from pressured?
And please since when has a normal kid from a non pc family ever felt any pressure when looking at toys?  Did any of you guys ever feel any pressure to choose a fire engine or a tank instead of your sister’s doll and tea set?

Debenhams drops ‘sexist’ toy labels: Parent’s don’t want children to feel pressurised into picking gender-specific options

By SARAH HARRIS

The High Street chain began removing ‘girls’ and ‘boys’ signs this week following a ‘sustained’ campaign from a parent-led action group.
Debenhams told the group on Twitter: ‘We would like to assure you that changes have been made to the way we categorise toys in our stores.
‘These changes will take place across all stores in the next few weeks.’ A spokeswoman said this meant the removal of all ‘girls’ and ‘boys’ headers in toy departments across the UK and Ireland. It is also currently reviewing its website.

READ THE REST
^
^

You really should read the whole article above to get a taste of just how far things have gone.

You’ll notice the paper refers to the store, Boots, as Chemist.  Boots is a very large Pharmacy chain here.  Generally, pharmacists are called chemists. It’s only in recent times and I suppose American influence, that many are starting to use American terms.

Boots removes store signs labelling girls’ and boys’ toys but says they are ‘dismayed’ after customers complain of sexism

By HARRIET ARKELL

The high street chemist admitted it had got its signage wrong after scores of shoppers complained about the separate signs for boys’ and girls’ toys.
· Science Museum experiment kits ‘for boys’ and tea-sets ‘for girls’ in Boots
· Chemist apologises for gender stereotyping and promises to remove signs

Chemist chain Boots is to remove in-store signs advertising science toys for boys after complaints from customers over gender stereotyping on Twitter and Facebook.

Shoppers complained about the high street chain suggesting toys from the Science Museum were for boys.
Yesterday the high street pharmacist said it was wrong to have labelled the toys according to gender, in a statement posted on its Facebook page.

READ MORE BOOTS

I wonder just how many ppl bitched about it. One? 100? 10?  They don’t say but it’s a sure bet it doesn’t take a lot.
The squeaky wheel and all that.

These are very major retailers, caving in to lefty loudmouths.  Oh happy day now that little boys get to play with dolls. Hey, why should girls have all the fun?

These people are telling us that gender specific toys and even words will and in fact do, they claim, confuse children as to who and what they are.
Huh?

This island that once led the world and built an empire and ruled the waves did it with people who grew up confused as kids?
The guys at the Alamo weren’t sure who they were?
This whole damn thing is out of hand.
Can’t wait to see what the next demand will be.  You must know there will be one. Don’t you? 

From Sweden again …. Two years ago in 2011.
The campaign isn’t new. It’s been going on for awhile.

You’re all equal here: Swedish school bans ‘him’ and ‘her’ in bid to stop children falling into gender stereotypes

By Daily Mail Reporter

A pre-school in Sweden has decided to stop calling children ‘him’ or ‘her’ in a bid to avoid gender stereotypes.
The Egalia preschool, in the Sodermalm district of Stockholm, has made the decision as part of the country efforts to engineer equality between the sexes from childhood.
The option to implement the rules is underpinned by a theory that society gives boys an unfair edge.

‘Society expects girls to be girlie, nice and pretty and boys to be manly, rough and outgoing,’ says Jenny Johnsson, a 31-year-old teacher.

A BAN ON WORDS IN SWEDEN

Hey … can’t have boys that are going to grow up … gasp …. “manly”.

Posted by peiper     on 11/04/2013 at 06:00 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - October 29, 2013

these guys are lost without a map or gps. the country is doomed! Doomed I tell ya.

How much dumber does it get?  They have to be crazy to put with this crap. He’s a freekin criminal and besides that, I’m not even certain he’s human.  In American dollars this award works out to very near 40 grand. 
No wonder the scum of the earth are dying to come here. 

Algerian jailed for robbery is given £25,000 compensation because he was waiting too long to be deported

· Aziz Lamari was jailed for 12 months for robbery and detained too long
· Awarded £25,000 damages because attempts to deport him took too long
· Home Office accepted liability for basic and aggravated damages to compensate for 23 days unlawful detention
By Anna Edwards

A foreign national jailed for 12 months for robbery has been awarded £25,000 damages because he was detained too long while attempts were made to deport him.

In June last year, the High Court ruled that Algerian citizen Aziz Lamari should have been released the previous month.
This was based on how there was no realistic prospect of him being removed within a reasonable time frame and medical reports revealed he was suffering from serious mental illness and had twice attempted suicide.

It also found that the Home Secretary Theresa May was in contempt of court because her department failed to release Lamari after it accepted he should no longer be in detention and gave an undertaking to release him into suitable accommodation.

Lamari, 23, who has now returned to Algeria, was detained after his robbery sentence came to an end in December 2010 and his deportation ordered.
After Judge Barry Cotter’s ruling, the Home Office accepted liability for basic and aggravated damages to compensate for the period of 23 days unlawful detention, but denied liability for exemplary damages.

Today, the judge awarded £10,000 basic compensation plus £5,000 aggravated damages and took the exceptional step of saying the case called for an award of £10,000 exemplary damages ‘by way of punishment, to deter and to vindicate the strength of the law’.

He said that the unlawful detention had to be seen in the light of Lamari’s serious mental health problems and the evidence of his significant deterioration, as witnessed by his cellmate, could not be ignored.

‘It had been clearly set out that the continued detention of the claimant was the cause of his mental health problems and had been the likely cause of two serious suicide attempts.

Serious suicide attempts ?  BS!  If he was serious about topping his filthy self he’d have done it right the first time.  If he was mental, then all the better he take himself out. Authorities should have let him.  No great loss.
Read the rest of this and the comments at the link.  Maddening but interesting.
Freekin goofball justice criminal system and goofball judges.  And the shit they claim doesn’t even speak English.
This case and even worse is one reason they are lost without a map or gps. Doomed I tell ya.

source for story

Posted by peiper     on 10/29/2013 at 03:21 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Miscellaneous • REALLY WORTHLESS and PUTRID PEOPLE • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 24, 2013

thugs attacked an American student because he was ‘obviously not local’ & a Yank?

I have no idea what part of London he was in, but I know that even I can remember when streets here and in London especially, were safer than they are now.  Could be he was in one of those areas that are just no go and he and his friend were not aware. Who knows?
It sure would be helpful if sound was available. I can’t believe he’d pick a fight with five guys and expect to come out okay.  The article mentions Asian thugs although it is a bit hard to tell in places.

Brits that post comments on American stories always like to say, Only in America.  Like they’ve thought up something new.  Well, this happens so often here that I reversed things and commented only in the UK, but I bet the Mail won’t publish that.

American student scarred for life after brutal mob attack that was caught on CCTV three days after he arrived in the UK

Student Francesco Hounye, 22, attacked by gang in east London
Mr Hounye needed 23 stitches to his face after bloody beating
Police release shocking CCTV to track down gang behind assault

By Lucy Crossley

This is the shocking moment a group of thugs attacked an American student because he was ‘obviously not local’ and left him scarred for life.

Francesco Hounye had been in the UK for just three days when he was set upon by the gang, who smashed a bottle in his face as well as kicking and punching him in the vicious assault.

Detailed CCTV footage captured the attack on 22-year-old Mr Hounye, who was left covered in blood and needed 23 stitches in his face.

SEE AND READ MORE

Posted by peiper     on 10/24/2013 at 06:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 23, 2013

angry taxpayers ?  her view is ‘f*** the lot of them.’ benefits mum and 11 kids

The headline in the morning hard copy read as follows.

I USE ARMY OF SHOPLIFTERS TO SURVIVE, SAYS MOTHER OF 11 ON £60,000 IN BENEFITS ($97,055.64)

That’s in addition to the home that she is provided with to house that family.

Here’s the on line copy.  Oh ... she went on TV for a show called, “On Benefits and Proud” Problem is you see, she admitted to buying stolen property.
Take a look.  Great example for the next generation she is bringing up.

‘Everybody has to get stuff off shoplifters’: Mother-of-11 starring in On Benefits And Proud is questioned by police ‘after being filmed paying for stolen goods’

Heather Frost, 37, has 11 children and gets £900 in benefits every week
She appears in a new documentary and offers her side of the story
But she admitted on camera she relied on shoplifters to get cheap goods
Gloucestershire Police say they have interviewed her over the comments

By Luke Salkeld

Police are investigating the ‘Fagin’ lifestyle of a jobless mother of 11 who claims she only survives thanks to a network of shoplifters.

Heather Frost, who has never worked and is reputed to claim up to £60,000 a year in benefits, was filmed buying goods from sellers at her front door, including washing powder and clothes.

‘Everybody has to get their goods off shoplifters don’t they?’ she said.

Earlier this year, it emerged the 37-year-old and her family were to be given a £500,000 eco-home paid for by the taxpayer.

Now she is causing outrage again after she appeared to praise shoplifters who supply her with cheap groceries.

After paying a ‘seller’ for the items at her front door, she was seen in the documentary stacking her purchases in the kitchen.

She then told an interviewer: ‘I couldn’t survive without these.

‘I’d be lost without my shoplifters because they bring my washing powder. They do it at half price what the shop does.’

Miss Frost was being featured in On Benefits And Proud, which was made in the wake of widespread coverage of her plans to move into a brand new taxpayer-funded home with her family.

But her comments have prompted a police investigation into her shopping habits at home in Churchdown, Gloucestershire.

A spokesman for Gloucestershire Police said: ‘We are aware of the comments that were made on the Channel 5 programme regarding shoplifting and the purchase of stolen goods.

‘A 37-year-old woman has been officially interviewed after a caution at a police station and an investigation is ongoing.’

The documentary about families whose lives are supported by the state claimed Miss Frost receives £60,000 a year in benefits.

She said on the show: ‘Yes, it is my choice to have a large family but there is no law to say how many kids you can have.’

Miss Frost was due to move into a specially built six-bedroom home after she complained that her existing home was not safe.

Just weeks later she was refused the new home in Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, when it was said not to meet her needs.

The 1,850 sq ft detached property was designed with state-of-the-art technology to cut electricity bills – but it has now been given to another family.

She currently lives with her children, aged from three to 21, in two terrace houses that have been knocked together.

In the film, the foul-mouthed 37-year-old from Gloucestershire is seen telling her friends that as far as angry taxpayers are concerned, her view is ‘f*** the lot of them.’

Frost, who receives the equivalent of £60,000 a year, is now looking forward to a council-funded renovation of her current home, which will see the two three-bedroom houses she currently occupies knocked together to create a permanent six-bedroom house.

But, despite the vast expense to taxpayers, who spend a staggering £100 million on benefits every day according to Government figures, Frost, who has never had a full time job, says the system is put there to help people like her.

‘Yes, people don’t agree with the benefits system and s*** like that but the benefits system is put there to help people that can’t go out and work,’ she asserts.

‘Yes, it’s my choice and my decision to have a large family but there’s no law out there to say how many kids you can have or can’t have. There’s people out there with more kids than me, that’s my argument.’

She adds: ‘Fred West or someone who murdered someone wouldn’t have got as much s*** in the press as what I got. 

‘You only get what you’re entitled to. We have to budget. You know, a weekly shop costs quite a bit, then gas and electric for both houses - it’s all got to come out of it.

‘By the end of the week, you can guarantee you’re skint. We can’t afford to take the kids to Spain or on posh holidays.’

READ MORE AND SEE VIDEO

Posted by peiper     on 10/23/2013 at 12:03 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - October 20, 2013

her dogs kill girl, owner charged with causing suffering to dogs. this isn’t a joke

One for the books.

In essence, as reported elsewhere, the owner was charged officially with causing unnecessary suffering to her dogs.
Oh yeah … ooops. Forgot. Her dogs killed a young girl.  No suffering there of course.

When something like this can pass for justice, you know all is without question, finally lost. It isn’t as if she wasn’t warned in the past about how she kept her animals, but I guess when laws have no teeth, people just don’t pay much attention.

Owner of killer dogs walks free from court

The Evening Express

THE family of a 14-year-old girl savaged to death by four dogs said they were “disgusted” after the owner walked free from court with a suspended sentence.

Beverley Concannon kept one of her dogs, a big American bull mastiff, in a tiny cage where it went “stir crazy” along with two other pit bulls and another bull mastiff which were all kept cooped up in her council house.

The conditions led to them becoming stressed and “hyper aggressive” and they turned on Jade Lomas-Anderson at the house in Atherton, Greater Manchester on March 26.

The girl, who was on half-term school holidays and had stayed the night with Concannon’s daughter at the house, suffered “horrific” injuries “from head to toe”, Wigan Magistrates’ Court heard.

Pc Martin Burkinshaw, who was first on the scene after the 999 call, said: “I will never forget what I saw.”

Concannon, 45, who had been warned before about her aggressive dogs and how she kept them, admitted causing unnecessary suffering to bull mastiffs Buddy and Neo and Staffordshire bull terriers Ty and Sky between July 19 last year and March 25 this year.

Wigan Magistrates’ Court heard that she subjected the animals to “an environment that was detrimental to their well-being”.

She sat head down in the dock throughout the hearing just yards from Jade’s family, who broke into tears as the court heard distressing details of the incident.

But they marched out of court in unison as Concannon was told she would not be going to jail immediately.

The defendant, who is on benefits, was given a 16 week jail sentence, suspended for 12 months, and ordered to pay costs and a victim surcharge totalling £165. She was also banned from keeping dogs indefinitely.

-30-

EXPRESS

Posted by peiper     on 10/20/2013 at 02:47 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 02, 2013

finally … knife killer gets time. in prison hospital. so again, no justice.

Here we go again. How many times is this?
Oh hell. Anyone still counting?

I think when shrinks or whoever it may be, that allow scum like this to be free, should themselves be given a taste of what is done to the victims. Really.
There would surely be far less of this sort of thing. Just makes the blood boil. Not that things would be better if the black scum had found an older person, but damn. The kid here was only 16.  Jeez. Have trouble getting my head around that. 

Take a look. 

Psychiatric patient stabbed schoolgirl, 16, to death on bus in random attack after being released from prison despite fears about his mental health

Phillip Simelane has pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Christina Edkins
Sentenced to be detained indefinitely under the Mental Health Act
23-year-old stabbed Christina through the heart as she sat down on a bus
Simelane then walked calmly off the bus and was arrested 100 yards away
Criminal released from jail unsupervised despite concerns over mental health
Had convictions for violent crime including threatening his mother with knife
Christina’s family say authorities could have prevented her brutal killing.

By Martin Robinson

A knife-obsessed psychiatric patient will be detained for life in a mental hospital after he admitted stabbing a teenager to death as she took the bus to school to take a GCSE mock exam.

Phillip Simelane, 23, today pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Christina Edkins, 16, having plunged a blade into her heart in a motiveless killing during the Birmingham rush hour.

The killer, who had a string of violent crime convictions including threatening his own mother with a knife, calmly walked off the double decker after fatally stabbing the teenager as she sat down.

Today it emerged he had been jailed three times last year but despite the authorities having concerns about his mental health he was released at Christmas without any supervision.

Christina’s bereft family have said that had Simelane been monitored the killing of the ‘bright and beautiful’ 16-year-old would ‘never have happened’.

TIMELINE: HOW KNIFE-OBSESSED CRIMINAL WENT ON TO KILL

April 22, 2007: Found in possession of a lock knife, aged 16, and handed a police reprimand.

May 8, 2007: Discovered in an enclosed premises. No further action taken by police.

March 5, 2009: Battery conviction for assault after pushing a young relative up against a wall.

May 10, 2012: Criminal damage. No further action taken by police.

May 11, 2012: Criminal damage. Received a six-month conditional discharge.

May 21, 2012: Convicted and jailed for 11 days for assaulting a police officer who had responded to knife threats and assault against his own mother.

June 1, 2012: Released from prison and spent 42 days out of custody.

July 13, 2012: Convicted of assaulting and battery in the attack against his mother (which happened in May). Jailed for 101 days.

October 15, 2012: Released from prison and spent seven days out of custody.

October 22, 2012: Convicted of trying to steal a car, possession of cocaine and breach of licence of previous sentence for attacking mother. Spent 59 days at HMP Birmingham.

December 13, 2012: Released unconditionally, without any supervision from Birmingham Prison. Lived rough for the next three months.

March 7, 2013: Simelane fatally stabs Christina Edkins on the No 9 bus.

read more, source

Why aren’t there any bells going off when some mindless, sub human life form continues to be a problem?
Mental problems and violent behavior?  Delete the SOBs.  Or use them for medical experiments instead of cute furry animals. Why not?  They are totally worthless and a drag on taxpayers.  Besides mommy, who’d miss them? 

You can take em outta the jungle but can’t remove the jungle from them.  There are exceptions of course. Not too many tho. Maybe in another 1,000 yrs.
Hmmm. Not sure about that time frame. Might take a bit longer.

Posted by peiper     on 10/02/2013 at 08:25 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - September 28, 2013

they kill in cold blood in daylight, do video, plead not guilty and are called mister

Can anyone explain to me the purpose of a criminal trial, other than to determine if a person is guilty or not guilty?
What if a violent crime, murder for example, is committed in broad daylight?  Add witnesses to nail down the proof.  Or … forget the witnesses.  Sometimes they make mistakes or else they might be,
raaaaaaaaacists.  People like me for instance. I’m happily one of those.
However, what if the perp does the crime and then goes in front of a camera dripping his victim’s blood, weapon in hand?  How about that?
What need is there for a trial?  Why waste court time and give vermin a platform?  Why?  Can anyone please explain the point of that?

So here we are today with yet another headline that just screams RCOB.

Anyone, anywhere will know and recall some months back, when a couple of thick lip, broad of nose … Negroes ( mustn’t use the word that better describes the scum) used a car to run into and disable the Brit soldier victim.  Then, the black bastards cut him to ribbons, tried to behead him and then …. and then … faced a camera calmly explaining that this was revenge for the killing of muslims in muslim countries and saying there would be more killings of the infidels yadda, yadda.

Surely most of you saw that video, with one of them covered in blood and weapon at his side, also bloodied.  And a very brave woman who confronted him.  Any question of guilt here?
I thought it was all over, but no.  To my surprise, they are in court (via video link) and they both deny killing that soldier.
AND …. they want to be addressed by different names if you please.  They are of course being referred to as, Mister.  Get that would ya. Mister indeed.  These arrogant, lying, murderous bits of black filth.

Another news source ran a headline as follows.

“Woolwich murder suspects deny killing soldier.” Suspects?  Huh?  I had to look up the damn word to make sure I still knew what it meant. Hey, at the rate the English language is being raped and abused, maybe the word suspect had changed.  But no. So far it hasn’t but that’s just today. 
There isn’t any ‘suspect’ about this case.

H/T BBC News:  BBC

Two plead not guilty to Lee Rigby murder in Woolwich

Fusilier Rigby was killed close to Woolwich barracks in May

Two men accused of murdering soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich, south-east London, have pleaded not guilty.

Michael Adebolajo, 28, from Romford, east London, and Michael Adebowale, 22, from Greenwich, south-east London, denied the charges at the Old Bailey.
They are accused of murdering Fusilier Rigby near Woolwich barracks on 22 May.

The men also denied attempting to murder a police officer on that day, as well as planning to murder a police officer on or before that day.

Mr Adebolajo has asked to be known as Mujaahid Abu Hamza in court, while Mr Adebowale wants to be called Ismail Ibn Abdullah.

The men appeared via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, with Mr Adebowale sitting in front of a prison sign.

Fusilier Rigby’s widow, Rebecca Rigby, was in court for the hearing.

A trial date has been provisionally set for 18 November.

-30-

Posted by peiper     on 09/28/2013 at 04:54 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • muslims • Terrorists • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - September 24, 2013

pervert the language and soon the acts of killers become benign

Ok, how about militant terrorists ?  Wow, talk about PC and walking on eggs.

Once upon a time in a world that if not saner, and I believe it was, a rose by another name was a what?
Once upon a time the Beeb, as the BBC was called and sometimes still is, was the last word in objective reporting. Who,what,where,when and why if known.  It’s said that now the network has a left bias they hardly even try to hide.

I remember listening to the BBC when the staff spoke English. I mean the Queen’s English.  Now however, some of the ppl who do interviews and are part of the news programs have accents that are jarring to the ear.  Forgetting Hollywood, have you ever listened to someone from Scotland try and speak English?  It has been my misfortune from time to time, to call somewhere and find myself at a call center in Scotland.

What I’m trying to say is that there was once a standard but there no longer is.  And so it is here.

The vermin who killed so many innocents in Nairobi must not be called ‘terrorists’ but ... militants.

They were murderous bastards who enjoyed what they did and they caused terror.  So what’s with this militant crap? 

btw .....  there are some reports of rape having occurred as well as the killings, and mutilations.  Not sure yet if that is confirmed.

BBC under fire over guidance preventing reporters from using the word ‘terrorist’ when covering Nairobi massacre

BBC has continually referred to those behind the terror attack as ‘militants’

By Damien Gayle

The BBC has come under fire for referring to the perpetrators of the Kenyan shopping mall massacre as ‘militants’ rather than ‘terrorists’.

In coverage of the violence at the Westgate mall in Nairobi which has killed more than 60 the Corporation’s journalists have repeatedly described the attackers as ‘Islamic militants’.

It is understood that BBC guidance issued to staff tells them to avoid using the term ‘terrorist’ without attribution, but politicians have reacted with anger to the choice of language.

‘Most members of the British public would see the planned and systematic murder of dozens of innocent people in Kenya as terrorism.

‘Sadly, the BBC looks like it has made a bad judgement call on this and is out of touch with ordinary people on a very important issue.’

In four news bulletins this morning, Neal Sleat, newsreader on Radio 4’s today programme, did not use the word ‘terrorist’ once.

Instead he referred to the culprits as ‘Islamic militants’, while reporters on the BBC website describes those responsible as ‘suspected al-Shabab militants’.

The BBC has come under fire before for apparent influence of political correctness on the choice of language in its journalism.

In January it was criticised for calling the gang behind the Algeria hostage killings ‘militants’ rather than ‘terrorists’. Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said he was disappointed that the broadcaster was ‘consistently’ using the term.

The BBC has specific guidance about the word terrorist, warning its reporters that it can imply value judgements. In one report on its website about the attack at BP’s gas plant, it described the killers as ‘militants’ 12 times. The word ‘terrorist’ appeared only in a quote.

Mr Bridgen quizzed David Cameron on the issue and the Prime Minister agreed that he had a ‘good point’. He added: ‘These are terrorists and they should be described as such.’

Prior to that, in 2011’s summer riots, the BBC repeatedly referred to rioters as ‘protesters’ - even as they were filmed looting shops and attacking police.

source

Posted by peiper     on 09/24/2013 at 12:22 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • muslims • Politically Correct B.S. • Terrorists • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

just another example of how wrong the world has become. not to mention stupid!

Where’s the penalty in this?
Where’s the punishment that makes an impression that might cause this miserable bastard to think 2wice before doing it again?

Why is 12 years of age too young to be named?

This little shit raped a 6 year old girl, then tells cops .... “I don’t care”.
Why can’t he be made to care?  Cutting off his pecker might go a long way to convincing the scum that he does indeed care.

What a gross miscarriage of justice. Oh wait ... he was fined.

It this sort of thing that has me convinced the F****** world is mad.  What the F*** was the judge thinking?  Or, maybe she wasn’t. This judge perhaps has nothing to think with.  Good grief.  The little girl is almost a baby.  Even in my far away day at age 12 I knew and so do you at any age, right from wrong, good from evil.  I think we all know it even before our parents teach it.  But the born criminal, the bad seed, that life form knows as well but just does not care.

Schoolboy, 12, who showed no remorse after raping six-year-old girl walks free from court and is ordered to pay her just £300

The boy told probation officer ‘I don’t care how she feels’ when asked about victim

He was given a 12 month referral order at Ipswich Youth Court

He was also banned from contacting the victim or her family for 12 months

By Steve Nolan

A schoolboy who raped a six-year-old girl twice has walked free from court despite telling a probation officer ‘I don’t care’ when asked how his young victim felt following her ordeal.

The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, admitted forcing the girl to carry out a sex act on two occasions, Ipswich Youth Court heard.

But during a meeting with a court official, who was compiling a pre-sentence report, the youth showed no remorse for his victim.

Prosecutor Simon Newell said the boy was asked what he felt about the impact of his crimes on his victim and replied: ‘I don’t care how she feels.’

District Judge Celia Dawson told him that she was not sending him to a secure youth offending unit because she did not want him to be in the company of ‘older and more sophisticated criminals’.

The boy, who lives on the Suffolk and Norfolk border, was given a 12 month referral order and a 12 month restraining order banning him from contacting the victim or her family.

He was also ordered to pay £300 in compensation to the girl, having admitted two counts of rape at an earlier hearing.

The court heard that the boy’s parents took him to a police station when they heard about the sex attack allegations where he admitted what he had done straight away.

Judgee wudgee then went on to make the following erroneous statement.

‘I hope you are aware if you don’t change your attitude you may have very serious problems in the future.’

District Judge Celia Dawson

No you fucking idiot!  The people with the serious problem are his future victims.
If we’re lucky judge --- maybe it’ll be someone close to you.  There’s always hope. Wonder what your judgement will be then. ??

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 09/24/2013 at 11:17 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • Outrageous • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - September 18, 2013

idiot judge orders moment of silence for dead gang member. what next?

Insomnia at 3am ... pills not working ... so booted to see what’s what and found this.
There is NO way to ignore the suck up stupidity of the action by yet another idiot, accommodating and appeasing judge.

Some background for you readers briefly.

You will recall the riots that burned cities here in recent years.  The excuse used was the shooting by police of a black gang member who it was thought, was reaching for a weapon inside a car he was riding in.  It turned out there were indeed guns in the car, but a question as to whether the negro was actually going for a gun or had one in hand.  When a cop has to make a quick life and death decision, seconds count.  Fact ... there were weapons in the car. 

So now there another inquiry into the shooting.  When a black is shot or killed by cops in line of duty, the inquests hardly ever end.  They go on and on because of course as everybody knows ... there isn’t any such animal as a guilty black person. Only guilty and racist cops.

That now brigs us to this latest inquest in which the judge .....

Orders moment of silence for ‘notorious gangster’ whose shooting death by police marksman sparked wave of riots: Unprecedented move at start of Mark Duggan’s inquest

Do you understand now why I claim this place is DOOMED?  Anyone disagree?  Have your say.

Judge takes unprecedented decision to hold a moment’s silence for Mark Duggan at start of inquest into his shooting by police

The 29-year-old was shot twice by police marksman in Tottenham, London

His death sparked the 2011 London riots

Judge Keith Cutler asked everyone inside the courtroom to fall silent

The request is understood to have been made by Duggan’s family

Decision to hold a silence at an inquest is virtually unprecedented

The inquest at the Royal Courts of Justice is expected to last two months

By ARTHUR MARTIN

A judge took the highly unusual step of leading his court in a moment’s silence to commemorate Mark Duggan, the alleged gangster whose death sparked the 2011 riots which scarred Britain.

Judge Keith Cutler, sitting at Duggan’s inquest, asked everyone inside the courtroom to fall silent and to acknowledge the ‘regrettable loss of a young life’.

Later the inquest heard Duggan was a member of one of Britain’s most notorious gangs and was shot by a police marksman who believed the suspect was about to fire a revolver in a crowded street.

Judge Cutler, sitting as a coroner at the High Court, led the 20-second silence by lowering his head and clasping his hands together.

Addressing the jury, he said: ‘It is right that you should know that present in court today are a number of Mark Duggan’s family and friends and to acknowledge the grief of those family and friends and to respect that loss we will together just have some moments of silence as we sit here to recognise the seriousness of the hearing for which we are about to undertake.’

The request for a moment’s silence was understood to have been made by Duggan’s family and supporters.

Inquests, by their nature, involve the passing of a loved one, but are not generally used to commemorate someone’s death.

The decision to hold a period of silence at the start of an inquest is virtually unprecedented.

more text and a slew of photos here

Posted by peiper     on 09/18/2013 at 06:00 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - September 13, 2013

surrendering to the forces of darkness

Earlier this week a judge ruled that a muslim woman could not remain covered as people need to be identified and a full face cover defeats that.  Makes sense to the more civilized and rational.
While I am no expert on the Koran, I have heard some muslims say that there is nothing in the Koran about a full face cover, only that women must dress modestly.  The admonition on exposure isn’t meant to include the face.  When the judge ruled against the pushy broad I thought, good.  About time.  You wanna walk around in public looking like the Lone Ranger fine.  Do it in a country where it’s natural, not to mention backward.  So cheers for the judge. Right?
Well not so damn fast kemosabe. 

JUDGE BACKS DOWN OVER FULL FACE COVER

A muslim woman should be allowed to stand trial without taking off her full-face veil, because forcing her to do so would breach her human rights, a court has heard.

Making the woman remove her niqab would also be counter to the “tolerant” approach to Islamic dress in the UK, her barrister argued.

The defendant, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, was allowed to enter a not guilty plea to a charge of intimidation of a witness, with her face covered after a judge backed down from previously saying she must show her face in court to be identified properly. She had argued that it was against her religious beliefs to show her face to men.

Judge Peter Murphy later heard legal argument about whether the woman should be allowed to stand trial without wearing her veil and is due to hand down written directions on Monday.

Her barrister, Susan Meek, argued that the woman, from London, had a right to wear the veil during trial in November under Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which safeguards religious beliefs. She also highlighted the “tolerant” approach taken to Islamic dress in the UK.

“She is entitled to wear it in private and in public,” Ms Meek said. “That right to wear the niqab also extends to the courtroom. There is no legislation in the UK in respect of the wearing of the niqab. There is no law in this country banning it.”

Judge Murphy allowed the woman to enter the dock at Blackfriars Crown Court and deny a charge of intimidation after she had been identified in a private room by a female police officer.

The Metropolitan Police constable, who was present when the defendant was photographed following her arrest in June, then swore on oath that it was the same woman under the niqab in the dock. Beforehand the defendant had not even been able to enter the dock, because her identity had not been checked.

At the start of Thursday’s hearing Judge Murphy said he had been given a substantial amount of material since the last hearing in August regarding the woman’s right to keep her veil on. He then said: “I would be satisfied for the officer giving evidence, having seen the defendant backstage so to speak in a private setting, saying she could identify her.”

http://news.uk.msn.com/judge-hears-face-veil-trial-pleas

But that isn’t all in news from the front where the West and civilization is being overrun by the forces from the dark ages. The war is being lost on all fronts as those who should know better, appease, accommodate and just plain cave in to the forces of darkness. 

Last week a college issued rules regarding dress code and ruled that the female students of the muslim faith could not cover their faces. An issue of safety and identification meant nothing to the more militant and ignorant both in and out of that group.  But the college said that was the rule and it was going to stand by it.  Well good for them.
Oh yeah?
Not so damn fast kemosabe.

Ban on Muslim students wearing religious veils scrapped by Birmingham college after public outcry

Birmingham Metropolitan College had asked teenagers to remove items

Staff said it was for safety and ensures people are ‘identifiable at all times’

By Matt Chorley, Mailonline Political Editor

A college which tried to ban pupils wearing the full facial veil for security reasons has abandoned the rule after a public outcry.

All students, staff and visitors to Birmingham Metropolitan College were told they must have their faces visible at all times so they are ‘easily identifiable’.

But the move was heavily criticised by some students, one describing the policy as disgusting. Nick Clegg said he was ‘uneasy’ about the idea.

More than 800 people claimed they planned to attend a protest against the policy today to stand up to what they said was an ‘Islamophobic’ decision.

David Cameron’s spokesman said the Prime Minister defended the right of educational institutions to be able to ‘set and enforce their own school uniform policies’.

But Deputy Prime Minister Mr Clegg said he felt ‘uneasy’ about a veil ban in a schools, although he could understand why it was needed to identify people at airport checkouts.

The college which has 44,000 students and is the third largest in the UK, said headwear poses a security risk and their policy ‘includes the removal of hoodies, hats, caps and veils so that faces are visible’.

This would stop female Muslim pupils from wearing the niqab, the full facial veil where only the woman’s eyes are visible, or the burqa where the eye area is covered in mesh.

But the college has now issued a statement saying it has decided to modify its stance to allow individuals to wear ‘specific items of personal clothing to reflect their cultural values’.

More than 9,000 people signed an online petition set up by NUS Black Students’ Campaign calling on the college’s principal Dr Christine Braddock to remove the ban.

SOURCE FOR MORE ON THE SURRENDER

And so little by little they will gnaw away the foundations. With the approval and encouragement of the lemmings and enablers of the left.
This is what the Death of the West looks like.  Expect more of the same.

I’m pretty sure that when it starts to happen in the USA on same scale, if it hasn’t started already, you folks back home won’t be very much surprised. But will anyone be in any position to halt the advance?  Depressingly, I doubt it.  Oh sure, there are millions of guns in the hands of private citizens.  But no organization worthy of the name.  And as you all know I am sure, you can’t make a move or a phone call or send an email or a snail mail but that agencies of the govt. will know everything you say and everything you plan. 
Wouldn’t it be nice if the field could be leveled, and numbers of folks desperate to save country and freedom, were able to infiltrate those agencies as well as get elected to public office and start taking charge of law enforcement agencies.  But I think that might take far more time than we have left.

Sorry for the downer folks.  I guess I’m reading and hearing and seeing too damn much, and find nothing that I find encouraging.

Posted by peiper     on 09/13/2013 at 07:49 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

ANOTHER BAD CALL BY AN IDIOT JUDGE … WE REALLY DON’T EXPECT BETTER THESE DAYS.

This is one hell of a story.
I guess this now passes for justice over here.

This guy is rowdy in a pub and is one of those violent drinkers I guess.
So there a fight which spills out into the street.
He’s a real bruiser as you will see, and I really urge you to look at the video assuming it’s still up and running.

Anyway, the thug bites a chunk out of the other guy’s tongue. Now how the heck he managed that I don’t know, but he did.
So the victim is bleeding badly and thug runs off.  Victim goes after him, catches up and proceeds to beat him up, after which he goes to a hosp. Where it is found, they can’t reattach the bit that’s been bitten off.  So now the poor guy speaks with an impediment.

So when the case comes to court …. and btw the guy who did the damage has a long record of violent behavior … well the judge, a skank named Gillian Matthews who we can only wish the worst upon, let the creep off because, she trusted him to stop his violent behavior. This in spite of previous convictions for same.

This same judge freed a paedophile because he claimed that his seven year old victim, came on to him.  You couldn’t make that up.
In 2011 she told a serial criminal he could do jail, “standing on his head.” So she gave him s suspended sentence saying he needed tougher punishment.  ??????  Yeah. I don’t understand that either.

He’s seen here mugging for the cameras outside the court after being freed.

Be sure to catch the video and see the idiot lemmings who support him. It’s all a funny joke.
I think the victim should find a gun, shoot the SOB and then claim diminished mental responsibility. He might luck out and get the same judge. I’ll tell ya true, if I were ever on a jury deciding a case like that, no way in the world would I ever vote to convict the victim.  Yeah, yeah the law.  Well F*** the law. Most of the time it’s an ass anyway.

Poking a tongue out at the law… Thug laughs as he avoids jail for vile attack

Grandfather David Greaves began headbutting and punching Kevin Dufton
When Dufton grappled with him, Greaves bit off chunk of his victim’s tongue
Window-cleaning firm boss admitted causing grievous bodily harm and given a two-year suspended jail term and ordered to pay £2,000 compensation

By Eleanor Harding

A thug who bit off a man’s tongue mocked his victim outside court after he was spared jail by a judge.
David Greaves, 50, pumped his fist and shouted ‘tongue’s twisted!’ as he celebrated avoiding custody for the sickening assault.

The window cleaner has a string of previous convictions for violence and was expected to be locked up for attacking father-of-two John Dufton.

But Judge Gillian Matthews instead handed down a suspended sentence because she ‘trusted’ him to stop his violent behaviour.

Scroll down for video

The same judge sparked controversy last year when she refused to jail a convicted paedophile who claimed a child made sexual advances towards him.

Yesterday, victim Mr Dufton, 33, was ‘furious’ with the leniency of the sentence and is demanding a review by the Attorney General.

A family friend said: ‘This man has done this sort of thing before on a number of occasions. A suspended prison sentence for biting off someone’s tongue just doesn’t make sense.’

Teesside Crown Court heard how Greaves started the trouble inside a pub in Chester-le-Street on May 25 by head-butting and punching Mr Dufton. As the fight spilled outside, Greaves tried to gouge his victim’s eyes with his thumbs.

Prosecutor Peter Sabiston said: ‘He pulled his head down, inserted his tongue, shook his head and somehow managed to latch on to Mr Dufton’s tongue.

He was horrified as the defendant then bit him.’
Despite his injuries, Mr Dufton chased his attacker and gave him a ‘comprehensive beating’ before going to hospital.

Surgeons were unable to re-attach the missing part of the tongue, which had been taken to hospital in ice.

He said: ‘The pain was unbearable, I was in agony, the worst pain I have ever known in my life. The fact that he celebrated like he did outside court, sticking his tongue out, just shows what kind of man he is.’

Greaves, who has convictions for violence going back to 1997, said he had no memory of the biting.
He admitted causing grievous bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years.

Judge Matthews called it a ‘truly horrific’ attack, adding: ‘How he behaved to you in advance did not justify your disgraceful conduct, which must have been a truly horrendous thing.’

However, she said she was ‘trusting’ Greaves, of Pelton, County Durham, to stop his violent behaviour and handed down a two-year suspended jail term.

She also ordered him to pay £2,000 in compensation and imposed a two-year restraining order. Last year, Judge Matthews outraged children’s charities after freeing paedophile John Thompson, who accused his seven-year-old victim of ‘coming on to him’.

In 2011, the judge told serial criminal James Wanley he could do jail ‘standing on his head’ and needed ‘a tougher punishment’ – so she gave him a suspended sentence.

PHOTOS AND VIDEO HERE

Posted by peiper     on 09/13/2013 at 05:00 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - September 05, 2013

back for a brand new season of laffs and guffaws. the three stooges reborn. thank you.

Seeing this in today’s paper , I wondered what some really goofy looking photos of Cameron and Obama might look like alongside the president of France, shown here.  The Three Stooges, circa 2013.  I’d have liked to make it four but, believe it or not, even tho I searched, I couldn’t find a really silly or stupid looking real photo (not phtoshop) of John “Lurch” Kerry.

Well anyway ....  President Hollande of France says he will not take France into a bombing campaign against Syria all on its own.  He says if America goes in then so will France. 

So here. For your amusement and ridicule, and snide remarks too.  Ladies and gentlemen of bmews may it please you. I present our glorious wartime leaders for the year of our lord 2013.  The Three Stooges are baaaaak.  Yuk,Yuk

Who looks stupid now? Bid to ban picture that made French President look like a grinning idiot backfires as bizarre shot goes viral

Picture of Hollande gurning was released by French agency AFP
It was quickly withdrawn, sparking a censorship row
AFP is state-funded, but insists it was not asked to pull picture

By Daily Mail Reporter

This unflattering picture of Francois Hollande sparked a censorship row yesterday.

It shows the French President with a gormless-looking grin at a school to coincide with the start of the new term.

The image was released by a photo agency. And when the agency tried to withdraw it from circulation, the photo quickly hit social media sites like Twitter and went worldwide.

The photo shows Hollande grinning in front of a blackboard on which is written: ‘Today, it’s back to school.’

The photograph was taken on Tuesday during Mr Hollande’s visit to a school in Denain, northern France, to coincide with the start of term for hundreds of thousands of French pupils. It appears he was pulling a funny face to make the pupils laugh.

The original image came with the caption: ‘During a visit to the school Denain Michelet, September 3, 2013, Francois Hollande smiles, chairing a panel discussion on the reform of school timetables established by the government.’

AFP initially posted the picture on its website as available for downloading but – apparently concerned it was inappropriate for a head of state – both later issued a ‘mandatory kill’ notice, meaning the photo must not be used.

AFP wrote: ‘Due to an editorial decision this photo has been withdrawn. Please remove from all your systems. We are sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your cooperation.’

Despite the ban, however, the image quickly hit social media sites like Twitter, and sparked a flurry of comments.

One wrote: ‘Here is the new official photo of François Hollande. Please put up in all town halls!’

Another wrote that no amount of Photoshop editing software ‘can make the president look more intelligent’.

article source

Posted by peiper     on 09/05/2013 at 12:16 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Editorials • Eye-Candy • FRANCE • Fun-Stuff • Obama, The One • Scary Stuff •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - August 24, 2013

Grandpa

Posted by Christopher     on 08/24/2013 at 10:42 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner